Get DataMate free
Case study · Select Plant Hire

Wincham HQ: Select run Gaia on their own head office, and cut energy 65%

105,141 kWh down to 36,129 kWh across 15 cabins, over roughly twelve months (13 May 2025 to 30 April 2026). The largest measured saving in our estate, on a site the customer owns and occupies themselves.

Get DataMate free

or check how your site compares

Measure it · Fix it · Scale it · Check how your site compares

Other ways to start

  1. Recommended first step

    Get DataMate free on your next project

    We monitor your cabins until consumption settles, and you get the wastage review.

    Your cost: coordination, and one engineer at the board.

    Get DataMate free
  2. Talk about full AutoMate

    For teams ready to standardise cabins across projects.

    Your cost: a 30-minute call.

    Book an AutoMate call
  3. Check how your site compares

    Answer a few questions about your welfare setup, and see whether it looks higher-risk than comparable monitored sites.

    Your cost: 20 seconds and an email address for the result.

    Check how your site compares

This is Select’s own building

Wincham HQ is Select Plant Hire’s head office, not a client site they fitted on somebody else’s behalf. They bought it for themselves, put it on their own building, and it is the best commercial result we have.

Disclosure, because a QS will find it: the span runs 13 May 2025 to 30 April 2026, but monitoring was not continuous. There is no data for February 2026, and a wifi outage from 2 to 17 July 2025. The figures below cover the monitored period within that span, not every day of it.

The site

ClientSelect Plant Hire, their own head office
SiteWincham HQ, CW9 6DE
PowerGrid
Cabins15
Span13 May 2025 to 30 April 2026 (~12 months)
Monitoring gapsFebruary 2026: no data. 2 to 17 July 2025: wifi outage. The span is not continuous.

The result

65% reduction across the
whole monitored period
69,012 kWh saved
over ~12 months
£20,704 saved at 30p/kWh
the rate this customer pays
Before105,141.34 kWh · £31,542.40 at 30p/kWh
After36,129.29 kWh · £10,838.78 at 30p/kWh
Saved69,012.05 kWh = 65% · £20,703.62 at 30p/kWh
Per cabin~91 kWh saved per cabin per week, on the full billed period

30p/kWh is the rate Select told us they pay on this site. Rates are customer-supplied and range from 24p to 30p across the sites we publish, so a £ figure from one site is not comparable with another. We never average or total £ savings across sites. Standing charge excluded. VAT excluded. Costs shown are consumption only.

Why a twelve-month figure is the one to trust

The same site read 37% across a summer alone (13 May to 31 July 2025) and 65% across the full year (13 May 2025 to 30 April 2026). Savings peak in spring and autumn, so a summer-only window under-reads badly. This is why we publish whole-period figures with their period attached, and never headline a summer. Read the other way round: 37% in the mildest part of the year is a floor, not a ceiling; the physics that produce 65% across the full year say the same mechanism only gets more pronounced once the cabins are working harder. Wincham's summer figure was its least impressive version, not its best case.

What we found

The itemised findings are in the monthly reports; ask us for them

Which circuits ran out of hours, which drying rooms were left on, which appliances drew power nobody had accounted for: that is set out line by line across this project’s monthly reports. We publish the measured result here and leave the itemised list where it was written, rather than summarise it from memory.

Ask us and we’ll take you through what we found on this site: info@gaiagroupuk.com.

What changed

The circuit-by-circuit control list, not published, available on request

Which load categories went onto contactors here is in the commissioning record for the project. We publish what was controlled and never how the rules were configured, and for this site the commissioning detail has not been written up for publication yet, so we would rather leave it off the page than approximate it.

Ask us and we’ll tell you what went under control here: info@gaiagroupuk.com.

How this was measured

Every saving above is valued at what the equipment actually drew, not at its rated power: the time a load was switched off multiplied by that load’s measured average consumption in the conditions it was running in. That average is taken across every hour in the comparison, including the hours the load drew nothing, so it accounts for the periods a thermostat would have cycled the load off anyway, which makes the figure materially smaller than rated-power arithmetic would give.

Measured against the site’s own benchmark, at circuit level, in kWh. How we calculate a saving.

Check how your site compares All case studies